manuscript under consideration nature communications

Please make sure you have taken time to fully read the Author Instructions linked from the login page. Authors: Revised Manuscript Submission, Editorial Manager, How to respond Reviewer's/Editor's Comment for Manuscript Revision | #Response #letter #reviewer's. Revised manuscripts should be uploaded via the link provided in the editor's decision letter. For relevant manuscripts, we may request a source data file in Microsoft Excel format or a zipped folder. There are weekly meetings on which the editorial board (the paid by the journal) meet and check which manuscript to send to reviewers and select those reviewers. Like other Nature titles, Nature Communications has no external editorial board; editorial decisions are made by a team of full-time professional editors, who are PhD-level scientists. Figure lettering should be in a clear, sans-serif typeface (for example, Helvetica); if possible, the same typeface in approximately the same font size should be used for all figures in a paper. The Methods section should be written as concisely as possible but should contain all elements necessary to allow interpretation and replication of the results. We strongly recommend that authors ask a colleague with different expertise to review the manuscript before submission, in order to identify concepts and terminology that may present difficulties to non-specialist readers. Thanks so much For Commentaries or News & Views, titles of cited articles are not included. This section should be subdivided by short headings referring to methods used and we encourage the inclusion of specific sections for statistics, reagents and animal models. Full disclosure: Editage Insights is a product of Editage, a global provider of world-class scientific communication solutions. Nature Communications is an open access, multidisciplinary journal dedicated to publishing high-quality research in all areas of the biological, physical, chemical and Earth sciences. Considering the current pandemic situation, journals are finding it difficult to meet their desired timelines. The 'Manuscript Information' primary task is the second step in the manuscript submission process. Site design / logo 2023 Stack Exchange Inc; user contributions licensed under CC BY-SA. Using Kolmogorov complexity to measure difficulty of problems? Please supply colour photographic images in RGB colour mode. We. A competing interests statement is required for all content of the journal. [CDATA[// > Papers published by the journal represent important advances of significance to specialists within each field. Certainly, there are some cases where the purely limited nature of the canon evidently stands out. In addition, reviewers can access the manuscript online, which speeds up the review process. I think I am asking this question especially because Nature Journals have their own editorial workflow which is not as same a typical workflow of many journals. those who have had the fortune to be admitted to holy . Nature Communicationsuses standardNaturereferencing style. Cambrian lobopodians and extant onychophorans provide new insights into early cephalization in Panarthropoda. The manuscript text file should include the following parts, in order: a title page with author affiliations and contact information (the corresponding author should be identified with an asterisk); the sections required for each content type (see information for different content types) then References, Acknowledgements (optional), Author Contributions (Articles only), Competing Interests statement, Figure Legends and Tables. The dot pattern on a laser print often creates a moir pattern when scanned. What is the meaning of "decision in process" status? ISSN 2041-1723 (online), Human behaviour and social sciences studies, Characterisation of chemical and biomolecular materials, Follow this link for further information on the review process and how editors make decisions, Follow this link for information about the different types of contributions, along with their length and figure limits, http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.853801. If you want to participate in double-blind peer review, prepare your manuscript in a way that conceals the identities of all the authors and tick the appropriate box during online submission. Experimental protocols that describe the synthesis of new compounds should be included. Text for figure legends should be provided in numerical order after the references. But the confusing part is, is that the reviewer are now done with reviewing (Review completed) but the new status became apperently ''Manuscript under consideration". To obtain It means reviewers have been invited, but you can't read anything more than that. 9.3 weeks. What happen if the reviewer reject, but the editor give major revision? This is more confusing as generally, 'Manuscript Under consideration' means that the editor is considering the manuscript for peer review. Using this system, authors can upload manuscript files (text, figures, videos) directly to our office and check on the status of their manuscripts during the review process. Follow this link for further information on the review process and how editors make decisions. The abstract should not contain any undefined abbreviations or unspecified references. Cactus Communications. Editorial process is what separates content from simple data or information. Internet Explorer). What is an editorial process? Nature Communications is editorially independent, and its editors make their own decisions, independently of the other Nature journals. This document provides an outline of the editorial process involved in publishing a scientific paper (Article) in Nature, and describes how manuscripts are handled by editors between submission. You may wish to consider asking a colleague whose native language is English to read your manuscript and/or to use a professional editing service such as those provided by our affiliates Nature Research Editing Service or American Journal Experts.